EKG TEST CASES   ECG puzzler Case 17  

  • Below are two parts of a rhythm strip from a woman who was implanted with a Medtronic Myrel VM VVI pacer in 1983. This is a VVI.O pacemaker with a rate of 72/min.
  • The strips below where received by transtelephonic transmission for a routine pacemaker check!
    (see instruction for transmission)
  • The upper strip is with no magnet applied, the lower trace is the end of the period where a magnet was placed over the pacer.
  • What do you think of the patient's rhythm?
  • Is the pacemaker working well?

This is the last part of the transmission where a magnet was placed over the pacemaker.

Comments recieved from the Web

Comments on the tracings:


The patient has a ventricular pacemaker that is a VVI.0 (non-programmable)
It is interesting that this pacer is still implanted after 13 years.
The rhythm in the first strip appears to be supraventricular tachycardia at a rate of about 140/min.
The pacer is appropriately sensing the SVT and only begins to pace when the magnet is placed over the pacer.
Note the imprinted rate in the upper right hand corner which is the measurement made by the pacemaker transmitter/receiver system. The system also gives the pulse width of pacer spike but in this case it was not recorded on the strip we printed. This pulse width information is important thought as pulse width widening in this pacer is a secondary end point to indicate the elective replacement point for this pacer.
It is interesting that the SVT terminates during the application of the pacer magnet.
This suggests that the ventricle is part of the reentrant circuit or that retrograde conduction to the atrium has terminated the arrhythmia.
There is no sign of atrial activity and the rate of 140/min. seems slow for atrial flutter with 2:1 block.
Flutter is often detected by a saw toothed appearance of the baseline.
The choices would seem to be an SVT that terminated by chance when the magnet was applied, or that the magnet actually terminated the arrhythmia. This is similar to the case of more rapid ventricular pacing to terminate a nodal tachycardia.
This could be an example of under drive pace termination of an arrhythmia.
This technique is not very effective but can terminate some of the slower reentrant arrhythmias.
It is possible that this patient has either AVNRT or A/V reentry with slow AV nodal conduction to explain the slow rate of the tachycardia and the termination with ventricular pacing.

Dr. Michael Rosengarten